Anon, please note that my mobile version has limited features. To enjoy all of my perks, and to login into your account, please visit my desktop version.
CosmosHubGovernance Proposal: #940 Update expired IBC Client tendermint-388 for cosmoshub-4 vs sentinelhub-2 chain
All the key details of this blockchain governance proposal you need. This page delivers real-time voting stats—yes, no, abstain, and veto percentages—plus validator votes to show who's driving the decision. Our AI summary breaks down the proposal's essentials for quick understanding, while links to the full text and forums offer deeper exploration. Check the timestamp to stay on top of the voting deadline and make your voice heard!
Voting Period:
Jul 06 2024, 10:56:42 GMT+0000 ~ Jul 20 2024, 10:56:42 GMT+0000
Votes
Yes
98.44%
139614564.94 ATOM
No
0.02%
22537.42 ATOM
Abstain
1.54%
2184616.78 ATOM
Veto
0.01%
10946.18 ATOM
Validator | Tx Hash | Answer |
|---|---|---|
 BlockHunters 🎯 | - | DID NOT VOTE |
 BlockMatrix 🚀 | - | DID NOT VOTE |
 BlockPI | YES | |
 Blockpower | - | DID NOT VOTE |
 Blocks United | blocksunited.com | YES | |
 Blockscale | - | DID NOT VOTE |
 blockscape | YES | |
 Blockwavelabs | - | DID NOT VOTE |
 BlueStake 🚀 | YES | |
 BonyNode💚 | - | DID NOT VOTE |