Anon, please note that my mobile version has limited features. To enjoy all of my perks, and to login into your account, please visit my desktop version.
CosmosHubGovernance Proposal: #12 Are Validators Charging 0% Commission Harmful to the Success of the Cosmos Hub?
All the key details of this blockchain governance proposal you need. This page delivers real-time voting stats—yes, no, abstain, and veto percentages—plus validator votes to show who's driving the decision. Our AI summary breaks down the proposal's essentials for quick understanding, while links to the full text and forums offer deeper exploration. Check the timestamp to stay on top of the voting deadline and make your voice heard!
Votes
Yes
59.03%
62973338.23 ATOM
No
7.69%
8203669.92 ATOM
Abstain
33.28%
35498146.26 ATOM
Veto
0.01%
5526.14 ATOM
Validator | Tx Hash | Answer |
|---|---|---|
 VALIDEXIS | - | DID NOT VOTE |
 Valnodes - Carbon Neutral Staking | - | DID NOT VOTE |
 vido.info | - | DID NOT VOTE |
 Virtual Hive | - | DID NOT VOTE |
 Vitwit (Previously Witval) | - | DID NOT VOTE |
 VoidStake | - | DID NOT VOTE |
 w3coins | - | DID NOT VOTE |
 WALLAKIA | - | DID NOT VOTE |
 WeStaking | - | DID NOT VOTE |
 Wetez | - | DID NOT VOTE |